By the mid-eighties more than 100 million people all over the world had experienced ultrasound runs before these were born. Today, practically every pregnant woman in Europe and in The united states will have at least one ultrasound scan during her pregnancy. Most pregnant women receive their first affiliate for a scan throughout their first ante-natal appointment; only some of them question whether it is necessary and even fewer know of its potential harm. Most women’s magazines, newspapers, and pregnancy books tend to recommend ultrasound runs to ensure the safety and healthy development of the fetus, despite the fact that no study attests that having an ultrasound scan provides more benefits than not having one. In an official statement, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) said that no well-controlled study has yet proven that routine deciphering of prenatal patients will increase the results of pregnancy.
On the other hand, researchers in New york studied 15, 000 expectant mothers who received ultrasound runs. They concluded that deciphering 超聲波檢查 provided no benefits whatsoever in any of the risk categories such as premature babies, fetal death, multiple births, late-term-pregnancies, etc. In fact, up to this date, ultrasound runs haven’t revealed any information that is of clinical value. On the contrary, there is more evidence today than previously that runs can be harmful for the mother and the unborn child. The Association for Improvements in the Mother to be Services (AIMS), The united kingdom, recorded cases of women who aborted their perfectly healthy and fit babies as a result of misinterpreted runs. It is almost impossible to estimate how many women experienced similar ordeals since most cases are not reported.
In 1990 researchers in Finland conducted a large trial study with ultrasound. The ultrasound runs diagnosed two hundred and fifty women with placenta previa in early pregnancy, a condition where the placenta lies low and therefore may stop the baby from being born vaginally. The parents were informed that they should expect a Caesarean section. But when it located giving birth, only 4 women still had placenta previa. In almost all cases, the placenta moved out of the way when the womb begun to grow. Ironically, the control group, which received no ultrasound deciphering also had 4 women with placenta previa; all of them delivered their babies safely.
Human Guinea pigs
Despite the fact that respected medical periodicals like the Lancet, The Canadian Medical Association Journal, and the New The united kingdom Journal of Medicine have all discussing the hazardous effects of ultrasound use, mainstream medicine has all but ignored the negative evidence. Even the FDA has said on the dangers of ultrasound. According to a tale by the Associated Press, their position on the technique is this: “Ultrasound is a form of energy, and even at low levels, research laboratory studies have shown that it can produce physical effects in tissue, such as jarring vibrations and a rise in temperature… prenatal ultrasounds are not considered innocent. inch
Millions of women around the world, without thinking about the potential health risks of ultrasounds, are participating in the largest medical experiment of all times. Their babies are the guinea pigs in this experiment. They become liable to external and internal harmful influences when their delicate electromagnetic fields are distorted, out of line or damaged by highly concentrated doses of ultrasound; contact with that is neither natural nor suitable for any individual. We cannot solely rely on machines for diagnostic purposes simply because machines are viewed more unlikely that to make mistakes than doctors. All findings have to be interpreted properly before they can serve as a guide for treatment. As demonstrated in the above study, 98. 4 percent of the initial complications during the women’s pregnancy cleared on their own simply because the body knows how to deal with such problems perfectly well without involvement. Machines don’t know that the tellings they produce could actually turn out to be a wrong analysis.
A false analysis is not the only disadvantage that may arise from using ultrasound indiscriminately. In 1993 Foreign researchers studied 3, 000 women and found that frequent ultrasound deciphering between 16 and 38 weeks of pregnancy could produce babies up to and including third smaller than normal. Similar studies revealed that babies who had received Doppler ultrasound (to scan the child’s blood supply) had a lesser birth weight than babies who didn’t obtain a scan.
If the birth weight of a baby is reduced through ultrasound, think about other functions which are even more important for a child’s growth? One mentor in Calgary, The us, learned that children developed speech problems two times as often when come across ultrasound in the womb. Surgeon James Campbell from The us found that even one prenatal scan may be sufficient to cause delayed speech. Norwegian studies suggested ultrasound deciphering might even lead to mild brain damage in the developing fetus.
One large-scale Swedish study showed a link between ultrasound deciphering and left-handedness, which is often the result of slight prenatal brain damage. The study revealed a 32 percent greater chance of left-handedness among the ultrasound group when compared to an un-scanned control group. Needless to say, since 1975, when doctors started aggressive ultrasound deciphering late in pregnancy (usually to determine the child’s sex), rates of left-handedness have increased dramatically — especially among male babies.